
      The
Writer's Voice
      The World's Favourite Literary Website
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      

      WorldCom’s Woes 
      Reminiscent of a Three Stooges Routine
      
      
      by
      Gregory J. Rummo
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      

When one thinks of the phrase, “The Buck 
Stops Here,” it’s President Harry Truman who comes to mind. The buck to which he 
referred is a slang word for the counter passed from one poker player to another 
to indicate whose turn it is to deal the cards.
President Bush spoke earlier this week on 
Wall Street, expressing similar buck-stopping sentiments to the CEOs in 
corporate America. Only the bucks he was talking about are the ones you carry 
around in your wallet. And if you were an investor in Enron or WorldCom or 
Global Crossing or Merck, to name a few - you have less of them these days.
While the president was proposing longer 
jail time for corporate financial fudgers, WorldCom executives, amid Fifth 
Amendment invocations, were blaming their auditors for their financial woes. 
Bert Roberts, the chairman of WorldCom, blamed Melvin Dick, the Arthur Andersen 
partner for failing to uncover the firms accounting irregularities. Let’s throw 
in Jack Grubman, the Salomon Smith Barney analyst who hyped WorldCom’s stock to 
the unsuspecting hoi polloi, and we’ve got the financial equivalent of Moe, 
Larry and Curly.
Well, whose fault was it anyway, chowder 
head?
Like the Three Stooges, all three should 
shoulder the blame.
An accounting firm audits the work of its 
clients it doesn’t author that work. Like the computer adage, “garbage in equals 
garbage out,” the job of the auditor is to provide a professional critique of 
the financial statements that have been provided by the firm it is being paid to 
audit. If the auditor is also acting as a consultant to its client - most 
accounting firms do - that is yet another conflict of interest.
As the CEO of a small, privately owned 
company, I am familiar with this process. Once a year we have an outside 
accounting firm come in and audit our books. It’s not only a requirement of our 
two lenders, but three of the four share holders are located 12,500 miles away 
on the other side of the globe in Hong Kong. They are entitled to have an 
opinion about the company’s financial position other than what our own 
accounting department gives to them on a monthly basis.
When my bookkeeper presents me with the 
company’s income statement at the end of the month, I can look at the bottom 
line and immediately tell if it’s a reasonable number based on my expectations 
from the ebb and flow of the business over the prior four weeks.
It’s no big deal, really. It’s my job to 
have my finger on the pulse of our business. And WorldCom’s former CEO, Bernhard 
Ebbers, should have had his finger on the pulse of his business.
When the accountants come in at the end of 
the year, we present them with our own, internally generated year-end statements 
along with a tome of supporting documentation, which they then pore over for the 
better part of a week.
There’s no way we can make up the numbers 
here and expect to get away with it. Every dollar must be accounted for. Debits 
must match credits in the exact science of accounting.
At the end of the week, I sit down with the 
number crunchers and we have a wrap-up discussion. If the auditors have managed 
to find some unpleasant surprises, there might be some wiggle room, some give 
and take.
This is what President Bush meant when 
asked by reporters at a news conference about his decades-old involvement as an 
oil-company director. The President replied, “Sometimes things aren’t exactly 
black and white.”
But in WorldCom’s case, black became white 
when it should have been all red.
The rules dictating generally accepted 
accounting practices weren’t just tweaked or bent, they were clearly broken.
Executives managed to convince their 
auditors that it was okay to capitalize almost $4 billion in expenses. To put it 
simply, WorldCom spent $4 billion and attempted to convince everyone that it 
really didn’t spend $4 billion.
And somehow, incomprehensibly, their 
auditors went along with this charade while stock analysts continued 
recommending shares of the company to the rest of us poor suckers.
I can almost hear the boardroom discussions 
now from high atop WorldCom’s plush headquarters.
The chairman, a man dressed impeccably in a 
white shirt, red power tie and a blue pin stripe suit, clears his throat and 
speaks in a soft yet steely voice. “Alright, which one of you knuckleheads is 
responsible?”
“HE DID IT!!” Comes the chorus of replies 
in unison from the group of finger pointing executives seated around the long, 
well-polished mahogany table.
You get the picture?
Unfortunately, no one’s going “nyuk, nyuk, 
nyuk, nyuk.”
Gregory J. Rummo is a syndicated columnist and author of “The View from
the Grass Roots,” published in July, 2002 by American-Book. You may order an
autographed copy from his website www.GregRummo.com by clicking on the
banner below. You may e-mail the author at GregoryJRummo@aol.com

Critique this work
      
      
      Click on the book to leave a comment about this work
